City Council
Court halts $354 million development subsidy
Austin City Manager: Dallas discard vs Austin retread
They’re off and running for council
No Raise, No Praise for City Manager Marc Ott
executive session, despite absence of Council Member Spelman
by Ken Martin
© The Austin Bulldog 2012
Posted Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:25pm
The Austin City Council adjourned today for a closed-door executive session to tackle five posted agenda items—not the least of which was to evaluate the performance of and consider the compensation and benefits for City Manager Marc Ott.
Four hours and 20 minutes later the council reconvened in open session. After quickly disposing of two other agenda items, Mayor Lee Leffingwell called on Mayor Pro Tem Sheryl Cole.
Cole said, “I just wanted to say that we did in executive session take up Item Number 70, with respect to the compensation and benefits of the city manager, and we look forward to his continued service.”
That was the entire discussion of Marc Ott’s performance evaluation. Cole’s statement lasted a mere 12 seconds.
The Marc Ott-Fort Worth Connection
Ott’s hire as city manager recommended by subordinate
© The Austin Bulldog 2012
Posted Tuesday, August 14, 2012 2:37pm
Updated Tuesday, August 14, 2012 3:23pm
In late 2007, as Austin City Manager Toby Futrell was getting ready to retire, the city hired Arcus, a consulting firm based in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, to find suitable candidates for a new city manager.
Marc Ott, one of two finalists, was named city manager by a vote of 6-0 January 17, 2008, with one abstention.
The undated 22-page Arcus report, which The Austin Bulldog obtained through an open records request, suggests that Ott, who was formerly an assistant city manager of the City of Fort Worth, and another Fort Worth executive essentially came as a package deal.
Loud Rally Follows Final Council Vote For 8-2-1
AGR Cries Foul Over Work Session Votes for Hybrid;
Mayor Leffingwell Said Votes Driven by Ballot Deadline
by Ken Martin
© The Austin Bulldog 2012
Posted Tuesday, August 7, 2012 9:07pm
A high-noon rally by a loud crowd of Austinites for Geographic Representation (AGR) pulled no punches in criticizing the Austin City Council for casting a final vote today to put the 8-2-1 plan for electing council members on the same ballot as the 10-1 plan the group got on the ballot through petition.
AGR’s main complaints are that there was no groundswell of support for the 8-2-1 plan; that it goes against the recommendations of the council-appointed 2012 Charter Revision Committee, which recommended the 10-1 plan; and that it adds confusion and competition for voter approval of any form of geographic representation. Previous opportunities to enact some form of geographic representation have been voted down six times between 1973 and 2002.
A secondary issue for AGR is that only the first reading of the ordinance to put the 8-2-1 plan on the ballot was voted on in a regular City Council meeting, while the last two readings were voted on in council work sessions.
Two hours before the press conference, during the morning portion of today’s council work session, Mayor Lee Leffingwell announced that the votes taken in work session were driven by the deadline to approve measures to go on the ballot.
Council Backers of 8-2-1 Plan Accused of Self-Interest
But Facts Don’t Seem to Substantiate Such a Claim, as
by Ken Martin
© The Austin Bulldog 2012
Posted Monday, August 6, 2012 9:15 pm
At the August 2 City Council meeting, what was expected to be a pro-forma exercise in putting on the November 6 ballot a proposition qualified by citizen petition drive was sidetracked by some heated words aimed at Mayor Lee Leffingwell.
But where there is heat there is sometimes also light.
The light was shed on the question of whether the five City Council members who favor the 8-2-1 plan (Mike Martinez and Bill Spelman opposed) are acting out of self-interest to increase their chances of staying in office.
The reality is that a separate proposed charter amendment—which the council already approved to go on the November ballot—if approved by voters would disqualify all but one incumbent from running for reelection (more about that later).
City Manager’s Annual Review Postponed
by Ken Martin
© The Austin Bulldog 2012
Posted Thursday, August 2, 2012 8:43pm
Austin City Manager Marc Ott didn’t get his annual performance review today as scheduled.
Shortly after noon, Mayor Lee Leffingwell read the agenda items to be discussed in a closed-door executive session. The council meeting agenda was posted for the executive session to include Ott’s performance. But Leffingwell announced that Ott’s review was being postponed at the request of Council Member Bill Spelman.
Spelman had arrived in council chambers and took his seat on the dais shortly after 10:30am, about 20 minutes after the meeting started. And Spelman was present preceding the mayor’s announcement of the postponement.