Top Stories
Profile: Doug Greco for mayor
Court halts $354 million development subsidy
Latest articles
Prop 3 Proponents to Monitor Implementation
- Prop 3 Proponents to Monitor Implementation
- Austinites for Geographic Representation form
- committee to help guide work on 10-1 system
- by Ken Martin
- © The Austin Bulldog 2012
- Posted Sunday November 25, 2012 8:56pm
Fresh off a major victory in the November 6 election, some three-dozen fired up members of Austinites for Geographic Representation (AGR) packed the meeting room at the Austin Firefighters Hall last Monday evening to map out how to stay involved during implementation of the 10-1 system for council elections.
Volunteer political consultant Peck Young, who provided the strategy for the winning campaign, roused the crowd.
“We need to remember we won a campaign. We created districts. We have changed something a half century old and changed it for the rest of this century,” he said.
But he added a note of caution.
Young said, “The work to keep this fair and honest isn't over. I promise you we have work to do so this process is not perverted or corrupted by people who never wanted this in the first place.”
“We've got at least another year of hard work to be sure it's implemented correctly.”
City Hustles to Initiate Prop 3 Tasks
- City Hustles to Initiate Prop 3 Tasks
- Auditor coordinating with proponents of 10-1 plan
- to begin what will be a lengthy transition process
- by Ken Martin
- © The Austin Bulldog 2012
- Posted Thursday, November 15, 2012 1:25pm
Faced with a December 1 deadline to announce a call for volunteers to serve on the Citizens Independent Redistricting Commission (CIRC), and a panel of auditors to screen applications, the city auditor’s office has shifted into high gear.
The deadline was set by Proposition 3: Ordinance No. 20120802-015 to implement what was approved by 145,910 voters, or slightly more than 60 percent of those who cast ballots on this proposition November 6.
The CIRC will ultimately draw 10 council districts that the City Council will have no choice but to adopt for the November 2014 elections, subject to approval by the U.S. Department of Justice under the Voting Rights Act. Only the mayor will continue to be elected at-large.
The city’s Fiscal Impacts for Propositions 1-10 estimated that Proposition 3 includes a one-time cost of $888,000 for construction and build-out of new offices and additional ongoing costs of $1.4 million a year to operate the four additional council offices.
But the cost of the conducting the work necessary to draw council districts and get federal approval has not been determined.
10-1 Plan To Rule Council Elections
- 10-1 Plan To Rule Council Elections
- Both propositions for geographic representation pass
- but grassroots group dominates election results
- by Ken Martin
- © The Austin Bulldog 2012
- Posted Wednesday November 7, 2012 3:21am
- (Updated Wednesday, November 7, 2012 at 3:08pm)
- (Updated Wednesday, November 7, 2012, at 5:48pm.)
Austinites for Geographic Representation’s Proposition 3 won a thumping victory Tuesday with its plan for electing 10 council members from geographic districts and electing only the mayor at-large.
“This is a historic moment,” said retired State Senator Gonzalo Barrientos, who chaired the 2012 Charter Revision Committee. He told the crowd made boisterous when the early voting results were announced, “I have never seen the people of Austin come together like they did on this campaign—that is truly American.”
Some five hours later the Travis County Clerk’s report posted at 12:17am this morning indicates that Proposition 3 got 142,615 145,910 votes (60.02 60.15 percent) while Proposition 4 (the 8-2-1 hybrid plan) got 118,855 121,366 votes (51.08 percent). (Updated Wednesday, November 7, 2012, at 5:48pm.) Because Proposition 3 got the most votes it will be implemented and Proposition 4 will be rejected.
Mayor: My Commission Beats Your Commission
- Mayor: My Commission Beats Your Commission
- Mayor Lee Leffingwell lifts idea for citizens to draw
- council districts and undercut opposing proposition
- by Ken Martin
- © The Austin Bulldog 2012
- Posted Friday, November 2, 2012 6:22pm
On Wednesday Mayor Lee Leffingwell's automated telephone calls rang the phones of thousands of Austin voters to criticize the Independent Citizen Redistricting Commission for City of Austin that's part of Proposition 3’s 10-1 plan for electing council members from geographic districts. (More about the transcript of that call later.)
Today, the mayor held a noon-hour press conference at City Hall to propose his own version of a “Citizens Committee to Review Redistricting” that would be used if Proposition 4’s 8-2-1 plan passes and gets more votes than the Proposition 3 plan put on the ballot through a petition drive led by Austinites for Geographic Representation (AGR).
The chief difference between the two redistricting proposals is that Prop 3’s Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission would draw council districts the City Council would have no choice but to adopt.
The mayor’s proposed committee would only be advisory and the City Council would be able to reject, revise, or adopt the committee’s recommendations.
Prop 3 Fundraising Outpaces Prop 4
- Prop 3 Fundraising Outpaces Prop 4
- Financial support for 10-1 council elections
- far outstrip dollars donated for 8-2-1 hybrid
- by Ken Martin
- © The Austin Bulldog 2012
- Posted Monday, October 29, 2012 9:11pm
Austinites for Geographic Representation (AGR), proponents of Proposition 3’s 10-1 plan for electing council members, continues its lopsided advantage in fundraising compared with Austin Community for Change (AC4C), which is backing the 8-2-1 hybrid plan for electing council members.
Through the previous reporting period that ended September 29, AGR had raised a total of $69,793. That’s 15 times the $4,592 raised by AC4C.
Today’s reports indicated that AGR raised an additional $54,058, bringing its total to date to $123,851. AGR still has $13,856 left on hand for the sprint to the finish.
AC4C’s latest report indicates the 8-2-1 hybrid plan backers raised $14,600, bringing its total to date to $19,192. AC4C still had $1,227 on hand through today’s report.
Investigative Reports
For more than a decade the Bulldog has published hard-hitting, in-depth investigative reports that have shaped civic discourse and public policy, resulted in criminal prosecutions, and enlightened voters about candidates' records. Here are a few samples of our work:
About us
The Austin Bulldog is the premiere investigative journalism outfit in Central Texas. Established in 2009, the Bulldog has become a trusted independent voice for government accountability, known for its incisive, in-depth coverage of local elections and local governments.
Newsletter
Keep up with the best investigative reporting in Austin.
Follow us
Bulldog Team
Ken Martin
Founder and EditorOur critical accountability journalism wouldn't be possible without the generous donations of hundreds of Austinites. Join them and become a supporter today!
Areas of Coverage
Austin City Manager: Dallas discard vs Austin retread
Lame duck council set to vote on 20-year sweetheart tax deal for developer
Environmentalists assail plan for lakeside high rises
Urbanists vie to replace council member Kathie Tovo
First-ever opportunity to elect appraisal board members
Announcing the Government Accountability Project
Central Health launches search for new CEO
First-ever opportunity to elect appraisal board members
Announcing the Government Accountability Project
Project Connect
Lawmakers weigh axing Project Connect’s ‘blank check’ loophole
Project Connect scope drastically scaled back
Austin Transit Partnership gears up for key decisions on light rail design
Become a Bulldog supporter
The Bulldog is funded by its readers. We're not affiliated with any political party or interest group. We're not paid by corporate sponsors. Support us today so we can continue to be a trusted voice for government accountability.